Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Anti-abortion display provokes student protesters

Demonstrators angered by graphic depictions of aborted fetuses

Published: Thursday, April 15, 2010

Updated: Saturday, November 20, 2010 21:11

Abortion Protest 1

The Inquirer

Abortion Protest 7

The Inquirer

Abortion Protest 5

The Inquirer

Abortion Protest 3

The Inquirer

An anti-abortion group's graphic posters of aborted fetuses drew angry reactions from dozens of students Tuesday and Wednesday in the Main Quad. Although some protestors "pushed the envelope," both sides remained non-violent, campus police said.

The group, Project Truth, drew a bigger crowd on the second day, with numbers reaching upwards of 30 students

Student protesters were more organized Wednesday, bringing picket signs that read, "If you can't trust me with a choice, how can you trust me with a child?" and chanting, "Our bodies, our choice, our campus."

Political Science major Rane Stark said that members of Project Truth were pushing "religion and extreme fundamentalism" on DVC students.

"Women should have the right to choose what to do with their bodies and have a baby on their own terms," she said.

Project Truth travels around the state, visiting college campuses to display posters, distribute information and speak with students, member John Ficker said.

"Our whole objective is to inform them of the humanity of the unborn child and the inhumanity of abortion," Ficker said. "We believe students should be fully informed."

While some students said they appreciated Project Truth's presence on campus, a majority on both days appeared angry at the group's large, graphic photographs and its anti-abortion message.

The furor overshadowed the Queer Straight Alliance's celebration of the National Day of Silence, which also took place Wednesday in the Quad. Many QSA members left their event, which is aimed at drawing attention to LGBT bullying, to join the protests against Project Truth.

Bill Oye, dean of student life, said the anti-abortion group was not doing anything illegal because its photographs of fetuses were not of a "sexual nature that appeals to a prurient interest."

"I don't agree with them but they have a right to express it," Oye said.

The protests began Tuesday after DVC student Annie Diehl, 20, came upon Project Truth's display while passing through the Quad and jumped up on the cement stage to talk with the groups' organizers. Other students joined her and began shouting, "Take it down." Soon, some 30 students were gathered around, with a dozen or more shouting with Diehl.

DVC student Shera Macciocchi, 30, was detained by campus police after a Project Truth member put her under citizen's arrest for passing out the group's pamphlets and directing students to throw them in the trash.

"He grabbed me by my arm," Macciocchi said. "They had me surrounded by a group of the Project Truth people…so that I couldn't get away."

After her release by Police Services, Micciocchi returned to the Quad to continue protesting. She said she was particularly offended by the photographs.

"It's OK to say what you want, but the images I feel are very unacceptable," Macciocchi said. "I am a woman, I am a mom [and] I have a child. But the decisions I make in my life are my decisions."

Lt. Tom Sharp said some students "were pushing the envelope," but both groups remained non-violent.

 "We had a few extra people there to keep everybody behaving themselves," Sharp said. "Based on the content of what was going on there, both sides were passionate."

One Project Truth member, who refused to give his last name, said students protesting the display "believe in legalized child killing."

He said the group opposes abortion and Plan B, the "morning after pill," but agrees with the use of contraceptives that "do not allow conception," such as condoms.

Chelsea Colbert, student director of DVC's brown bag lecture series, stood with members of Project Truth on Tuesday, even though she herself is pro-choice.

Colbert said that 28 years ago she was a student at Chabot College and pregnant with her second child. She was considering having an abortion when she saw a Project Truth display and spoke with its members.

"If they hadn't been there, for sure I would have had an abortion," she said. "I didn't want to have an abortion, but I couldn‘t see another answer. Here I was a single mom living in abject poverty ... I was just so lost."

Student Jon Danyeur, 20, said he doesn't agree with the group's anti-abortion message but was more annoyed with the protestors because their loud shouting disrupted his math class.

Staff writer Oksana Yurovsky contributed to this article.

 

Contact Ariel Messman-Rucker at amessmanrucker@theinquireronline.com

 

 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

16 comments

Anonymous
Tue May 4 2010 23:07
The display made me hungry
Anonymous
Mon May 3 2010 12:58
Makes me not want to eat sweet and sour pork for a while
Anonymous
Thu Apr 29 2010 01:45
Actually, contraception has been a gateway to abortion. Widespread contraception always leads to the lack of respect for human life. This was prophetically stated in Pope Paul XVI's landmark enclyclical on life: Humane Vitae. In it, the Pope indicated that the use of artificial birth control would lead to the break up of marriages(it has), the abuse of women(it has), abortion(it has) and euthanasia(it's happening as we speak, folks.) Quite an accurate look into the future from a 1960's prophet of the church.
Denise
Tue Apr 27 2010 18:38
To Anonymous who thought the photos of the fetuses were fake: Check out neutral fetal development sources. I used the Mayo clinic at mayoclinic.org. By the fifth week of development the fetus develops lungs, intestines and bladder. The "blob of tissue" scenario is a lie!
Anonymous
Sat Apr 24 2010 10:24
For the clown that misquoted the Dean, you should have noted that the Dean was referring to the claim by some twisted students that the pictures were "pornographic" and can be banned. The Dean rightly pointed out the difference and rightly defended free speech activity in an American society. But then a student leaning toward a socialistic state would not appreciate someone showing the reality of the INJUSTICE of abortion!!
Howie
Anonymous
Sat Apr 24 2010 10:09
To Anonymous,
So my dad was on to something when he would call me "a little snot"? I'm glad I didn't know he was trying to dehumanize me in order to take me out of this world when he was calling me a snot!! So was I a "human-being" snot? And even though I wasn't fully developed as a small "snotty child", was I less than a "human being?" Man, am I glad my dad didn't know that he could have still killed me under the snot law.
And what's with the accusation that the abortion pictures came from a hoax magazine about aliens?? You really need to stop reading those magazines. Your lack of reason and foolishness about preborn babies has twisted your thinking process to the point that you are seeing "alien snot balls" under every rock. Instead you should watch the PBS( not known for being on the prolife side) special called "Life in the Womb" and look for "snot ballsl" within the amazing photography of the LIFE of preborn babies in the first trimester. You'll get more from this educated presentation that your alien magazines.
Howie
Anonymous
Thu Apr 22 2010 16:43
Bill Oye, the dean, is a coward and a moron. Hey dean; you have no problem with aborted fetuses being displayed because it isn't sexual? So sex is offensive to you but not violence and gore? Are you that afraid of your own genitals? You're pathetic... We deserve so much better than this puritanical piece of crap.
Anonymous
Thu Apr 22 2010 16:41
One thing that wasn't mentioned is that the bald man on the right in the 3rd picture was quoted as saying "having an abortion won't un-rape you."
Anonymous
Thu Apr 22 2010 13:38
"If men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament."
Anonymous
Wed Apr 21 2010 02:37
Karen, the so called "truth" can easily be given through words. Either spoken or written. They do not need to erect large pictures of graphic and gory images.

Also, the pictures of supposedly aborted fetuses that were shown during the protest were false.

How do I know this? Because even at that stage of life, a fetus will not have a digestive track, nor would they have individual fingers or ANY type of internal bone structure. Instead, they would resemble a snot ball.

Since snot balls are not disgusting enough, they decided to lie purely for shocker value.

Also, they used pictures from a hoax magazine with a front page of "alien babies".

As for the pictures on the bottom right hand side, they were more likely to be miscarriages.

Very rarely do women have late-term abortions.

Karen
Tue Apr 20 2010 16:10
Why are people so outraged by the pictures. Is it because they don't want to see the remains of a baby violently torn to pieces by abortion. if you support abortion, then support abortion. Do you want the truth hidden from women. If we can't trust women with the truth, how can we trust them with the choice? Project Truth brought pictures, handed out literature and engaged in discusssion. They were threatened, had some of their literature taken and a small minority of student tried to cause a scene which only brought more attention to the display. That small minority of students got an education on the first amendment. The rest of the students either supported the display or engaged in honest dicussions or debate.
Beth
Tue Apr 20 2010 12:59
Paul: after reading your comment, I wouldn't be surprised that a Project Truth member would want to hide!!! lol Btw, unless you are God, you cannot know with certainty what someone's motivations are.
John
Mon Apr 19 2010 23:46
Does Paul sound rational? Or civil? Paul for the sake of argument lets say everything you say about the Project Truth team is true. Now please answer this question rationally: How does any of this make it right for an abortionist to dismember an innocent human being just because she is in her mothers womb?
Anonymous
Sat Apr 17 2010 23:30
Actually, they did not give their names because of death threats they have received.

Also, to make this clear... these people did in fact have the right to post those large signs of supposedly "aborted fetuses"

However, just because you can do something doesn't mean you should. They could have at the very least put them on small pamphlets or brochures instead of blowing them up on a large scale and shoving the pictures down throats.

Anonymous
Fri Apr 16 2010 23:50
Wow! I am going to assume Paul does not include himself in a "civil discourse like responsible citizens" after his tirade of hatefilled words like "scum", "twisted lunitics", "blah,blah,blah", and other uncivil words. No wonder the folks from the prolife group did not want to give their identities out. Howard
Paul
Fri Apr 16 2010 13:55
"One Project Truth member, who refused to give his last name..."

Absolutely typical of these scum. They act all wide-eyed and innocent, "We just want women to KNOW" and blah blah blah, but when the time comes to tell the ACTUAL truth about their motivations or even their identities, they hide.

These people are harassers, bullies, woman-haters, and twisted lunatics who should really be seeking mental health treatment so they can figure out how to engage in rational, civil discourse like responsible citizens.







log out